The previous segment talked about how journals, publishers, and societies stand to benefit from having a social media presence. Here, Payman Taei, founder of Visme, talks about how they can go about it in an organized manner and in a way that helps them build a solid reputation as an influential player in the scholarly communications landscape.

Social networking may be only a decade old as we know it today, but it’s already switched almost everything about our daily lives for all time.

People post absolutely everything on social media, converting it into perhaps the most intimate communication medium that we presently have. There are things that people would never even think about daring to say in a one-on-one conversation that get spread across Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and more on a regular basis.

Because social networking is so intimate, it also represents a massive chance for brands and businesses, particularly academic journals and publishers, who know what they’re doing. Today, more and more scholarly entities are adopting the “social” treatment, making their presence felt on social media platforms, especially Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

Because a social media presence is so powerful and so visible, it also brings with it a host of potential traps and mistakes that you could lightly fall into if you’re not very, very careful. The flip-side of that coin, however, is that mistakes happen in real-time as well. If you make a colossal social media blunder, people all over the world could learn about it in seconds. Because of this, there are a few key things you’ll need to keep in mind moving forward.

1. Talk to your audience – don’t just market to them: One of the fattest social media mistakes that you can make involves assuming that social media is just for selling, as opposed to what it’s indeed good for: relationship management. Don’t simply promote research articles you have published. That could emerge as blatant marketing and your audience might get annoyed by it. It could also be monotonous for readers to look at. Post different types of updates and be genuine when you talk about topics relevant to your audience. For example, if you are talking about open access (and you have to suggest an open access publishing route), don’t simply promote yourself, share relevant blog posts that explore some aspects of open access publishing, or share your views about open access. Your followers (authors, reviewers, lay people, etc.) will find this more interesting.

Two. Attempt out different content formats: Case in point – Infographics. The Visme team has written in the past about how effective Infographics are, particularly in terms of social media. They’re a nice, bite-sized visual format that can let you contextualize a lot of different concepts in an lightly digestible way. But don’t assume that just because you’re putting an Infographic on social media, it will be successful. Don’t just take what is essentially a commercial for your products or services and dress it up in an Infographic. Instead, pay attention to the conversations that your real audience members are already having and see what you can contribute by way of your next Infographic.

Reminisce: With social networks like Facebook and Twitter, you’re never more than just a few quick mouse clicks away from learning a almost limitless amount of information about your audience. Let this context inform the decisions you make when you sit down with a contraption like Visme (which I happen to be the founder of) to create that next Infographic.

Don’t begin with your Infographic idea and work your way to your audience. That’s the exact opposite of what you want to do. Instead, begin with your audience and ask yourself “what questions can I reaction and what problems can I solve with the Infographic I want to create?”

This puny, yet essential, difference in perspective is how you end up with an infographic that is liked and collective indefinitely via social media platforms.

Three. Share different content formats: Don’t stick to infographics only; attempt out other formats. Two other content types you could use to post updates about research on social media are lay summaries and movie abstracts. Lay summaries or plain language summaries provide a quick overview of research in easy-to-understand terms. Movie abstracts, which visualize research, also work well because movies are engaging and a excellent way to engage attention online. SlideShare presentations are another visual means of engaging your audience. Irrespective of what format you choose, you could either share content that you have published or created yourself, or you could share something interesting and of relevant you came across.

Four. The “current event” problem: Another one of the thickest mistakes that scholarly journals and publishers tend to make on social media is attempting too hard to be too relevant to current events.

Sometimes, these types of mistakes are puny – you were a little too impatient to take advantage of the number one trending hashtag on Twitter so you sent out a blatantly self-promotional tweet without realizing exactly what you were linking yourself to. At best, this comes off as another case of “I think social media is only for selling.” At worst, it’s exceptionally insensitive and a massive PR problem just waiting to happen – especially with the type of news that it is all too common to wake up to every day.

Before you even consider attempting to create a connection inbetween your publication/institution and a current event, ask yourself a number of key questions. Very first, be raw, real and fair: “Is my publication/institution/funding figure actually relevant to this trending discussion that I’m attempting to capitalize on?” If the response is a hard “no” then you need to stay far, far away. Next, ask yourself if the end result of your activity will be to give something legitimately engaging or valuable to your users? Tying in with a big global event like Open Access Week, for example, is a fine way to have a little joy with something that has already captured the attention of so many. If the response to this is once again “no,” you’d be better off focusing your efforts elsewhere.

Five. Do some background research: Creating and maintaining a social media presence will require time and energy, a positive attitude, and sense of creativity. Before you begin posting your updates on social media platforms, spend some time exploring the platform, analyzing what other journals or researchers are posting on it, identifying what makes your publication/institution unique, and defining your target audience. That said, don’t overdo it. At some point, you need to get out there, test the waters, and switch your treatment as needed.

6. Reminisce that timing is significant: Timing is of very high importance in anything that you do. If you see the world, everything is done in ideal timing – the earth’s rotation, revolution, day and night, the seasons…everything. Similarly in scholarly publishing, too, timing is crucial. Stay updated about major events, such as academic conferences, global events, major meetings, etc. Also, know when your audience is most active. For example, if you are looking to reach out to researchers in Asia, make sure you post in their time zone so that they are able to view your posts real time. Also, determine a frequency that works best for you. You will find what works best for you eventually and after repeated iterations. Some publishers tweet or post updates over four times a day, while some do this just once.

7. Know what platform works best for you: Most successful business and marketing professionals spend 30% to 75% of their time on social channels. As an academic publisher/society, you will determine the kind of investment you would like to make over a period of time. Use this time to build a strong understanding of social media platforms and how they would work for you. Facebook tends to work good for retailers, food and beverage, and other B2C industries but it also works well for some scholarly publishers such as Nature. A platform like Twitter has broad reach and appeal almost everywhere across the globe. Also, a majority of academic journals, publishers, companies, service providers, researchers, and many other people related to and interested in scholarly publishing are active on Twitter. If you have a lot of visual material to share, Tumblr and Pinterest work are superb platforms to explore. Use LinkedIn to connect with and reach out to professionally driven researchers and other publishing professionals. You could also use LinkedIn for your staffing needs (journal editors, reviewers, etc.).

And there are many more niche sites, too. One critical aspect to consider is the accessibility of a platform in the location of your target audience. For example researchers in China may not be able to access Twitter; this means that to reach out to Chinese scholarly community, you need to use a medium that is accessible to them, e.g., WeChat. Also, it is not uncommon for publishers to be on more than one site, so they can keep themselves branded and connected to each site they have a presence on.

We’re all still learning

The fact of the matter is that social media is still a relatively youthfull communications platform – meaning that it is largely still switching right before our very eyes.

If you had said when Facebook originally launched in 2007 that it would one day (potentially) influence the outcome of a United States presidential election, people would have called you crazy – and yet here we are, in 2017. The point is that as social networking proceeds to grow and evolve, the relationships that both publishers and authors have with these networks must proceed to do the same. That naturally presents something of a permanent learning curve – meaning that you can and likely will make mistakes.

But by understanding exactly what social networking is and what it is best used for, along with making sure that you’re always beginning from the right place whenever you begin to interact with your audience on Facebook or Twitter, you put yourself in the best position to avoid the types of career killing blunders that can only happen in the social era in which we’re now living.

Related reading: Why journals, publishers, and societies should get on social media right now

Related video: The Character of a Disciple: Part 1 – Character is Destiny


admin_en | 1@1.com

Related Posts

The Kyoto Prize, Japan’s highest award introduced annually for outstanding lifetime achievement, will be announced tomorrow, June 20, 2014. The internationally esteemed prize is introduced to selected intellectuals worldwide who have dedicated themselves for the scientific, cultural, or spiritual betterment for humanity. Individuals are selected from fields that are not traditionally honored by the Nobel […]

Nineteen November 2012] This paper is a contribution to the Text Customization for Readability Online Symposium. It was not developed by the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) and does not necessarily represent the consensus view of W3C staff, participants, or members. Optimal Colors to Improve Readability for People with Dyslexia Luz Rello. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, […]

Person writing on paper documents Getty Pics Comping File and Movie Preview License Agreement THIS IS A LEGAL AGREEMENT Inbetween YOU (“LICENSEE”) AND A SUBSIDIARY OF GETTY Pics, INC. (“GETTY Photos”). THIS AGREEMENT APPLIES TO LICENSES ISSUED VIA THE WEB AND VIA LOCAL SALES REPRESENTATIVES, AND IS APPLICABLE TO ONLINE, DIGITAL AND ANALOGUE (PHYSICAL) DELIVERY […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *